Phone number information

. A lawyer who, since 1991, repr?nte r?li?ment of the customers before the Commission of num?s of t?phone at the office of. This time, the Commission had refus?e to provide the num?s direct t?phone. It had then indiqu?u petitioning Section of the statute of r?gi?seul the num?s of their secr?anger or their conform?nt?a practical current consisting?e not r?ler the num?s. L.avocat had port?lainte with the Police chief. Commission, is the paragraph 19(1), the persons in charge d.une governmental institution are held to refuse. This protection s.appliquer with the num?s of t?phone to work can - even a soulev?par question the complaint. Another s.est question however pos?pendant. not possible d.invoquer the paragraph 19(1) to justify l.int?it?es organizations quasi constant that its members exert quasi legal functions and that them ind?ndance and impartialit?ourraient?e compromised if the citizens had acc??eurs num?s to be able to call upon?on right the paragraph 19(1), the information that l.on does not want to communicate owes l.article 3 of the Law on protection Des. is tr?large and includes/understands all the information. This vast d?nition is however restricted. According to these alin?, certain information does not constitute. personal information. for purposes of l.article 19 of the Law on. Bearing police chief s.est particuli?ment fond?ur on its station or its functions, in particular, (ii) its title and the address and num? of. The Police chief pointed out that the Law pr?it nothing as for the direct num?s of t?phone civils servant and concluded but the paragraph 19(1) l.information n.offre no legal basis which allows?a Commission to refuse the communication of the direct num?s of t?phone of its. The Police chief has ajout?ue the num?s direct t?phone are provided to the expenses of the taxpayer and for professional ends to solve the question of knowing if, legally speaking, proc?res quasi legal is prot?e. principle, for end d.analyse, qu.une such guarantee exists, the Commission n.a not according to him avanc?e l.int?it?e these proc?res risked probably d.?e compromised by the communication of the num?s of t?phone. Particuli?ment, m? if the direct num?s of t?phone of its members are publi?et communiqu?depuis many ann? and m? some are so of the num?s reproduced on Internet sites and the calling cards, the Commission n.a not been able to largely give d.exemples l.existence case of protocols accept?sur?rendre measurements by the people exer?t of the quasi legal functions in the cases of importunate communications (including the calls t?phonic)?nant people live? by. By cons?ent, the Police chief concluded qu.il d?gatoire being able to justify the noncommunication in this case and has recommand?a disclosure of the num?s. d.une zone of protection of the life priv?beaucoup more restricted than d.autres responsible s.explic, of course, by the volont?e to allow the citizens to treat with persons in charge. statement of possible accounts in l.administration. particuli?ment in high the sph?s, to provide?es civils servant a line is gard?ecret, this practice does not rest on laws granting to the institutions f?rales the right to refuse the communication of these num?s if those are demand?en virtue of the Law on. Of course, this business has ramifications for the other d.information types of the kind, as the addresses to communicate addresses of mail?ctronic is. R?rences?es articles, paragraphs, alin?, and/or under-alin? sp?fic in the Law on the acc??' information: